Karabacak M, Ozkara BB, Margetis K, Wintermark M, Bisdas S. The Advent of Generative Language models in Medical Education. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e48163.
Google Scholar
Preiksaitis C, Rose C. Opportunities, challenges, and Future Directions of Generative Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e48785.
Google Scholar
Safranek CW, Sidamon-Eristoff AE, Gilson A, Chartash D. The role of large Language models in Medical Education: applications and implications. JMIR Med Educ 14 août. 2023;9:e50945.
Google Scholar
Abbott KL, George BC, Sandhu G, Harbaugh CM, Gauger PG, Erkin O, et al. Natural Language Processing to Estimate Clinical Competency Committee Ratings. 2021;78(6):2046–51.
Johnsson V, Søndergaard MB, Kulasegaram K, Sundberg K, Tiblad E, Herling L, et al. Validity evidence supporting clinical skills assessment by artificial intelligence compared with trained clinician raters. Med Educ. 2024;58(1):105–17.
Google Scholar
Winkler-Schwartz A, Yilmaz R, Mirchi N, Bissonnette V, Ledwos N, Siyar S, et al. Machine Learning Identification of Surgical and Operative factors Associated with Surgical expertise in virtual reality Simulation. JAMA Netw Open. 2019;2(8):e198363–198363.
Google Scholar
Masters K. Ethical use of Artificial Intelligence in Health Professions Education: AMEE Guide No. 158. Med Teach. 2023;45(6):574–84.
Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor RA, et al. How does ChatGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing examination? The implications of Large Language Models for Medical Education and Knowledge Assessment. JMIR Med Educ 8 févr. 2023;9:e45312.
Google Scholar
Roos J, Kasapovic A, Jansen T, Kaczmarczyk R. Artificial intelligence in medical education: comparative analysis of ChatGPT, Bing, and medical students in Germany. JMIR Med Educ 4 sept. 2023;9:e46482.
Google Scholar
Knopp MI, Warm EJ, Weber D, Kelleher M, Kinnear B, Schumacher DJ, et al. AI-Enabled Medical Education: threads of Change, Promising futures, and Risky realities Across four potential future worlds. JMIR Med Educ,. 2023;9:e50373.
Google Scholar
Ahsan MM, Luna SA, Siddique Z. Machine-learning-based Disease diagnosis: a Comprehensive Review. Healthcare. 2022;10(3):541.
Google Scholar
Alowais SA, Alghamdi SS, Alsuhebany N, Alqahtani T, Alshaya AI, Almohareb SN, et al. Revolutionizing healthcare: the role of artificial intelligence in clinical practice. BMC Med Educ. 2023;23(1):689.
Google Scholar
Lucas HC, Upperman JS, Robinson JR. A systematic review of large language models and their implications in medical education. Med Educ. 19 avr 2024 [cité 4 juill 2024];n/a(n/a). Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.15402.
Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP. A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: theory and implication [published erratum appears in Acad Med. 1992;67(4):287]. Acad Med. 1990;65(10). https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/1990/10000/a_cognitive_perspective_on_medical_expertise_.1.aspx.
Kirkpatrick DL. Techniques for evaluation Training Programs. J Am Soc Train Dir. 1959;13:21–6.
Maicher KR, Stiff A, Scholl M, White M, Fosler-Lussier E, Schuler W, et al. Artificial intelligence in virtual standardized patients: combining natural language understanding and rule based dialogue management to improve conversational fidelity. Med Teach 4 mars. 2023;45(3):279–85.
Google Scholar
Ellaway RH, Tolsgaard M. Artificial scholarship: LLMs in health professions education research. Adv Health Sci Educ 1 août. 2023;28(3):659–64.
Google Scholar
Abd-alrazaq A, AlSaad R, Alhuwail D, Ahmed A, Healy PM, Latifi S, et al. Large Language models in Medical Education: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. JMIR Med Educ 2023;9:e48291. https://doi.org/10.2196/48291.
Boscardin CK, Gin B, Golde PB, Hauer KE. ChatGPT and Generative Artificial Intelligence for Medical Education: potential impact and opportunity. Acad Med. 2024;99(1). Disponible sur: https://journals.lww.com/academicmedicine/fulltext/2024/01000/chatgpt_and_generative_artificial_intelligence_for.11.aspx.
Chary M, Parikh S, Manini AF, Boyer EW, Radeos MA. Review of Natural Language Processing in Medical Education. Western J Emerg Med. 2019;20(1):78–86.
Google Scholar
Preiksaitis C, Ashenburg N, Bunney G, Chu A, Kabeer R, Riley F, et al. The role of large Language models in transforming Emergency Medicine: scoping review. JMIR Med Inf 10 mai. 2024;12:e53787.
Google Scholar
Stamer T, Steinhäuser J, Flägel K. Artificial Intelligence Supporting the Training of Communication Skills in the education of Health Care professions: scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2023;25:e43311.
Google Scholar
Tolsgaard MG, Boscardin CK, Park YS, Cuddy MM, Sebok-Syer SS. The role of data science and machine learning in Health professions Education: practical applications, theoretical contributions, and epistemic beliefs. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract déc. 2020;25(5):1057–86.
Google Scholar
Gordon M, Daniel M, Ajiboye A, Uraiby H, Xu NY, Bartlett R, et al. A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide 84. Med Teach 2 avr. 2024;46(4):446–70.
Google Scholar
Lee J, Wu AS, Li D, Kulasegaram KM. Artificial Intelligence in Undergraduate Medical Education: a scoping review. Acad Med J Assoc Am Med Coll 1 nov. 2021;96(11S):S62–70.
Google Scholar
Levin G, Horesh N, Brezinov Y, Meyer R. Performance of ChatGPT in medical examinations: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. BJOG Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2024;131(3):378–80.
Google Scholar
Haig A, Dozier M. BEME Guide 3: systematic searching for evidence in medical education – part 2: constructing searches. Med Teach. 2003;25:463–84.
Google Scholar
Hammick M, Dornan T, Steinert Y. Conducting a best evidence systematic review. Part 1: from idea to data coding. BEME Guide 13 Med Teach. 2010;32:3–15.
Google Scholar
Kolaski K, Logan LR, Ioannidis JPA. Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews. Syst Rev 8 juin. 2023;12(1):96.
Google Scholar
Feigerlova E. A Systematic Review on Impact of artificial Intelligence and ChatGPT in training and assessment in health professions education. 4 juin 2024; Disponible sur: Retrieved from https://osf.io/v5cgp/.
Collins G, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KGM. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(1):55–63.
Bates DW, Auerbach A, Schulam P, Wright A, Saria S. Reporting and Implementing Interventions Involving Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence. Ann Intern Med. 2 juin. 2020;172(11_Supplement):S137–44.
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ 24 mars. 2010;340:c332.
Mongan J, Moy L, Kahn CE. Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM): a guide for authors and reviewers. Radiol Artif Intell 1 mars. 2020;2(2):e200029.
Google Scholar
Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 28 août. 2019;366:l4898.
Sterne JAC, Hernán MA, MA, Reeves BC, Savović J, Berkman ND, Viswanathan M et al. ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions. BMJ. 2016;355:i4919.
von Elm E, Altman D, Egger M, Pocock P SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. The strengthening the reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147:573–7. Erratum in: Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:168.
Schünemann HJ, Brennan S, Akl EA, Hultcrantz M, Alonso-Coello P, Xia J, et al. The development methods of official GRADE articles and requirements for claiming the use of GRADE – a statement by the GRADE guidance group. J Clin Epidemiol. 2023;159:79–84.
Google Scholar
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 29 mars. 2021;372:n71.
Campbell M, McKenzie JE, Sowden A, Katikireddi SV, Brennan SE, Ellis S, et al. Synthesis without meta-analysis (SWiM) in systematic reviews: reporting guideline. BMJ. 2020;368:l6890.
Google Scholar
Gordon M, Gibbs T. STORIES statement: publication standards for healthcare education evidence synthesis. BMC Med 3 sept. 2014;12(1):143.
Google Scholar
Herrington J, Reeves TC, Oliver R. A practical guide to authentic E-learning. New York, NY: Routledge; 2009.
Google Scholar
Herrington J. Authentic e-learning in higher education: Design principles for authentic learning environments and tasks. Faculty of Education – Papers. 2006.
Brown JS, Collins A, Duguid P. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher. 1989;18(1):32–42.
Google Scholar
An P, Wang Z. Application value of an artificial intelligence-based diagnosis and recognition system in gastroscopy training for graduate students in gastroenterology: a preliminary study. Wien Med Wochenschr 1946. 2023. https://libezproxy.dundee.ac.uk/login?url=https://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=cmedm&AN=37676426&site=ehost-live&scope=site.
Chassagnon G, Billet N, Rutten C, Toussaint T, Cassius de Linval Q, Collin M, et al. Learning from the machine: AI assistance is not an effective learning tool for resident education in chest x-ray interpretation. Eur Radiol Nov. 2023;33(11):8241–50.
Google Scholar
Furlan R, Gatti M, Menè R, Shiffer D, Marchiori C, Giaj Levra A, et al. A Natural Language Processing–based virtual patient Simulator and Intelligent Tutoring System for the clinical diagnostic process: Simulator Development and Case Study. JMIR Med Inf 9 avr. 2021;9(4):e24073.
Google Scholar
Kanazawa A, Fujibayashi K, Watanabe Y, Kushiro S, Yanagisawa N, Fukataki Y, et al. Evaluation of a medical interview-assistance system using Artificial Intelligence for Resident Physicians interviewing simulated patients: a crossover, Randomized, Controlled Trial. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;19(12):6176.
Google Scholar
Kim AR, Park AY, Song S, Hong JH, Kim K. A microlearning-based self-directed Learning Chatbot on Medication Administration for New nurses: a feasibility study. CIN Comput Inf Nurs. 2024;42(5). https://journals.lww.com/cinjournal/fulltext/2024/05000/a_microlearning_based_self_directed_learning.6.aspx.
Liaw SY, Tan JZ, Bin Rusli KD, Ratan R, Zhou W, Lim S, et al. Artificial Intelligence Versus Human-controlled doctor in virtual reality Simulation for Sepsis Team Training: Randomized Controlled Study. J Med Internet Res. 2023b;25:e47748.
Google Scholar
Liaw SY, Tan JZ, Lim S, Wentao Zhou, Yap J, Ratan R, et al. Artificial intelligence in virtual reality simulation for interprofessional communication training: mixed method study. Nurse Educ Today. 2023a;122:105718.
Google Scholar
Meetschen M, Salhöfer L, Beck N, Kroll L, Ziegenfuß CD, Schaarschmidt BM et al. AI-Assisted X-ray Fracture Detection in Residency Training: Evaluation in Pediatric and Adult Trauma Patients. Diagnostics (Basel). 11 mars. 2024;14(6):596(6):596.
Shorey S, Ang ENK, Ng ED, Yap J, Lau LST, Chui CK et al. Evaluation of a theory-based virtual counseling application in nursing education. CIN Comput Inf Nurs. 2023;41(6). Disponible sur: https://journals.lww.com/cinjournal/fulltext/2023/06000/evaluation_of_a_theory_based_virtual_counseling.4.aspx.
Truong H, Qi D, Ryason A, Sullivan AM, Cudmore J, Alfred S, et al. Does your team know how to respond safely to an operating room fire? Outcomes of a virtual reality, AI-enhanced simulation training. Surg Endosc Mai. 2022;36(5):3059–67.
Google Scholar
Yang Y, Shulruf B. Expert-led and artificial intelligence (AI) system- assisted tutoring course increase confidence of Chinese medical interns on suturing and ligature skills: prospective pilot study. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;(16):7.
Zech JR, Ezuma CO, Patel S, Edwards CR, Posner R, Hannon E et al. Artificial intelligence improves resident detection of pediatric and young adult upper extremity fractures. Skeletal Radiol. 2024. Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-024-04698-0.
Schünemann HJ, Mustafa RA, Brozek J, Steingart KR, Leeflang M, Murad MH, et al. GRADE guidelines: 21 part 2. Test accuracy: inconsistency, imprecision, publication bias, and other domains for rating the certainty of evidence and presenting it in evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2020;122:142–52.
Google Scholar
Ross JG, Latz E, Meakim CH, Mariani B. TeamSTEPPS curricular-wide integration: baccalaureate nursing students’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions. Nurse Educ. 2021;46(6). Disponible sur: https://journals.lww.com/nurseeducatoronline/fulltext/2021/11000/teamstepps_curricular_wide_integration_.11.aspx.
Bandura A. Self-efficacy: the Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Macmillan; 1997.
Kiili K. Content creation challenges and flow experience in educational games: the IT-emperor case. Internet High Educ. 2005;8(3):183–98.
Google Scholar
Weng X, Ye H, Dai Y, Ng Olam. Integrating Artificial Intelligence and Computational thinking in Educational contexts: a systematic review of Instructional Design and Student Learning outcomes. J Educ Comput Res 1 oct. 2024;62(6):1640–70.
Google Scholar
Bandura A. Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1977.
Torre DM, Daley BJ, Sebastian JL, Elnicki DM. Overview of current learning theories for medical educators. Am J Med. 2006;1(10):903–7.
Vygotsky L. Mind in Society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press; 1978.
Kolb D. Experiential Learning: Experience As The Source Of Learning And Development. 1984.
Caffarella RS, Barnett BG. Characteristics of adult learners and foundations of experiential learning. In: Jackson L, Caffarella RS, editors. Experiential learning:a new approach. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Inc; 1994. pp. 29–42.
Knowles MS. Andragogy in action: applying principles of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1984.
Mergen M, Graf N, Meyerheim M. Reviewing the current state of virtual reality integration in medical education – a scoping review. BMC Med Educ. 2024;24(1):788.
Google Scholar
Melton R, Objectives. Competencies and Learning Outcomes: Developing Instructional Materials in Open and Distance Learning. 1997. p. 156.
Linn RL, Miller MD. Measurement and Assessment in Teaching. 9th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson; 2005.
Vickers R, Field J, Melakoski C. Media culture 2020: collaborative teaching and blended learning using social media and cloud-based technologies. Contemp Educational Technol. 2015;6:62–73.
Google Scholar
Obilor EI. Feedback and students’ learning. Int J Innov Res Educ 2 avr. 2019;7:40–7.
Jacobs SM, Lundy NN, Issenberg SB, Chandran L. Reimagining Core Entrustable Professional activities for Undergraduate Medical Education in the era of Artificial Intelligence. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e50903.
Google Scholar
Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Sci 25 oct. 2019;366(6464):447–53.
Holzinger A, Langs G, Denk H, Zatloukal K, Müller H. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. WIREs Data Min Knowl Discov 1 Juill. 2019;9(4):e1312.
Google Scholar
Markovski Y. Data usage for consumer services FAQ. OpenAI. juill 2024; Disponible sur: https://help.openai.com/en/articles/7039943-data-usage-for-consumer-services-faq.
Reilly C, Reeves TC. Refining active learning design principles through design-based research. Act Learn High Educ 1 mars. 2024;25(1):81–100.
Google Scholar
Harden RM. Learning outcomes and instructional objectives: is there a difference? Med Teach. 2002;24(2):151–5.
Google Scholar
Hartel R, Foegeding EA. Learning: objectives, competencies, or outcomes ? J Food Sci Educ. 2004;3:69–70.
Google Scholar
Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. 1986. p. 640.
Lin CC, Huang A, Lu O. Artificial intelligence in intelligent tutoring systems toward sustainable education: a systematic review. Smart Learn Environ. 2023;10(41).
Chan KS, Zary N. Applications and Challenges of Implementing Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: integrative review. JMIR Med Educ 15 juin. 2019;5(1):e13930.
Google Scholar
Masters K. Artificial intelligence in medical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(9):976–80.
Google Scholar
Masters K, Herrmann-Werner A, Festl-Wietek T, Taylor D. Preparing for Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) in Health professions Education: AMEE Guide 172. Med Teach. 2024;1–14.
Daneshvar N, Pandita D, Erickson S, Sulmasy LS, DeCamp M. Artificial Intelligence in the provision of Health Care: an American College of Physicians policy position paper. Ann Intern Med. 4 juin 2024 [cité 22 juin 2024]; Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.7326/M24-0146.
Charow R, Jeyakumar T, Younus S, Dolatabadi E, Salhia M, Al-Mouaswas D, et al. Artificial intelligence education programs for health care professionals: scoping review. JMIR Med Educ. 2021;7(4):e31043.
Google Scholar
Ng FYC, Thirunavukarasu AJ, Cheng H, Tan TF, Gutierrez L, Lan Y et al. Artificial intelligence education: an evidence-based medicine approach for consumers, translators, and developers. Cell Rep Med [Internet] 17 oct 2023 [cité 27 déc 2024];4(10). Disponible sur: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xcrm.2023.101230.
Száva-Kováts E. Unfounded attribution of the half-life index-number of literature obsolescence to Burton and Kebler: A Literature Science Study. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2002;53:1098–105.
Google Scholar
Wartman S, Combs C. Medical Education must move from the information age to the age of Artificial Intelligence. Acad Med 1 nov. 2017;93:1.
Tlili A, Shehata B, Adarkwah MA, Bozkurt A, Hickey DT, Huang R et al. What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart Learn Environ. 22 févr. 2023;10(1):15.
McKenney S, Reeves TC. Educational design research: portraying, conducting, and enhancing productive scholarship. Med Educ 1 janv. 2021;55(1):82–92.
Google Scholar
Richardson WS, Wilson MC, Nishikawa J, Hayward RS. The well- built clinical question: a key to evidence-based decisions. ACP J Club. 1995;123(3):A12e3.
Google Scholar
Frandsen TF, Bruun Nielsen MF, Lindhardt CL, Eriksen MB. Using the full PICO model as a search tool for systematic reviews resulted in lower recall for some PICO elements. J Clin Epidemiol 1 nov. 2020;127:69–75.
Google Scholar
Flanagin A, Pirracchio R, Khera R, Berkwits M, Hswen Y, Bibbins-Domingo K. Reporting Use of AI in Research and Scholarly Publication—JAMA Network Guidance. JAMA 2 avr. 2024;331(13):1096–8.
Google Scholar
link